• Menu Item
  • Stories
    • Tech
    • Auto
    • Guides
    • Opinions
  • Reviews
    • READERS’ CHOICE
    • ALL REVIEWS
    • ━
    • SMARTPHONES
    • CARS
    • HEADPHONES
    • ACCESSORIES
    • LAPTOPS
    • TABLETS
    • WEARABLES
    • SPEAKERS
    • APPS
  • WATCHLIST
    • TV & MOVIES REVIEWS
    • SPOTLIGHT
  • GAMING
    • GAMING NEWS
    • GAMING REVIEWS
  • m
  • menu
  • SEARCH
  • STORIES
    • TECH
    • AUTOMOTIVE
    • GUIDES
    • OPINIONS
  • REVIEWS
    • READERS’ CHOICE
    • ALL REVIEWS
    • ━
    • SMARTPHONES
    • CARS
    • HEADPHONES
    • ACCESSORIES
    • LAPTOPS
    • TABLETS
    • WEARABLES
    • SPEAKERS
    • APPS
  • WATCHLIST
    • TV & MOVIES REVIEWS
    • SPOTLIGHT
  • GAMING
    • GAMING NEWS
    • GAMING REVIEWS
  • m
Follow US

Ternox Games says 13 PlayStation games will disappear this week

GUSS N.
GUSS N.
2 hours ago

A dispute involving Ukrainian indie studio Ternox Games is set to remove 13 titles from the PlayStation Store on August 23, raising fresh questions about how much control developers and customers really have over games distributed through digital storefronts.

According to Ternox Games, Sony terminated its PlayStation developer and publisher agreement, a decision that means games developed or published by the company will be removed from PlayStation’s digital marketplace. Sony has not publicly explained the decision, leaving the circumstances surrounding the removal unclear.

The affected games are Nexoria: Dungeon Rogue Heroes, Finger Fitness, Retro Highway, Unichrome: A 1-Bit Unicorn Adventure, O-VOID: Console Edition, Run & Jump Guy, Scrap Divers, Fox’s Zen House, Boned Again: Survivors, Dungeonloop, IN-VERT, Taimumari: Complete Edition and Bullet Beat.

There is an important distinction that remains unresolved. A conventional PlayStation Store delisting normally prevents new purchases while allowing existing owners to retain access to previously acquired games. A more extensive removal could potentially affect access for existing customers as well. Ternox’s announcement confirms that the games are being removed, but the information available so far does not clearly establish what will happen to copies already tied to PlayStation accounts.

That uncertainty is arguably more significant than the size of the catalogue involved. Digital storefronts routinely lose games because licences expire, publishing agreements end or online services close. What makes this case notable is the apparent lack of a public explanation for why an entire publisher catalogue is being affected at once.

The situation has also disrupted Ternox’s future PlayStation plans. The studio had been developing a PS5 version of STONKS-9800: Stock Market Simulator, a financial management game already available on PC. Ternox says the termination means that PlayStation version will no longer happen. The developer had also considered a physical edition.

One theory circulating online links the decision to Sony’s efforts to reduce low-effort releases on the PlayStation Store. Digital marketplaces have struggled for years with cheaply produced games designed largely around easy trophies, copied concepts or minimal gameplay. There is currently no confirmation, however, that Sony’s efforts against such releases have anything to do with Ternox. Without an explanation from PlayStation, that connection remains speculation.

The episode nevertheless lands during a wider debate over digital game ownership. Buying a downloadable game generally grants users a licence governed by platform terms rather than ownership comparable to possessing an unrestricted physical object. Most delisted games remain downloadable for previous purchasers, but exceptions across digital entertainment have repeatedly demonstrated that access is not always permanent.

For Ternox, the immediate consequence is losing PlayStation as both a storefront for its existing catalogue and a destination for planned releases. For players, the bigger question is what happens after August 23. Confirmation that existing purchases remain accessible would make this primarily a publishing dispute; removing access from customer libraries would make it a much more consequential digital ownership story.

What do you think?
Happy0
Sad0
Love0
Surprise0
Cry0
Angry0
Dead0
Instagram’s new wordmark is getting roasted for its confusing letters
Acer targets mobile productivity with tablets, AR and AI eyewear
ChatGPT can now edit Google Drive files directly from chat
Team Falcons Crowned EWC 2026 Rocket League Champions
Minimal Phone 2: meet the BlackBerry-style Android phone
Kioxia’s new AI SSD reaches a staggering 10 million IOPS
Follow US
Caffeine. Chaos. Content.
© Absolute Geeks Media FZE LLC 2014–2026.
Proudly made in Dubai, UAE ❤️
Contact · About · Editorial Policy · Privacy Policy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?